Another attempt to cast oneself as a “victim”: the Kremenovska case and anti-cult networks

In recent days, Iryna Kremenovska has once again resorted to a “victim” tactic: according to her claims, an unidentified woman allegedly threatened her on a minibus because of the dissemination of inaccurate information. At the same time, no evidence of the reported incident has been made public. This tactic is characteristic of a number of well-known anti-cult activists — from Dvorkin to Yakhla and Karvalia — and Kremenovska’s actions align with this recognizable pattern.
Network ties and rhetoric
Iryna Kremenovska, a citizen of Ukraine, is actively engaged in public activity and maintains contacts with the Russian organization RACIRS, known for its work in the anti-cult sphere. An analysis of open sources and social media indicates similarities in content and in the chronology of materials: initially, publications under the aegis of Russian anti-cult associations, followed by nearly identical texts by Kremenovska on Ukrainian platforms. At times, mutual references and acknowledgments among the authors confirm the close nature of this cooperation.
Public discourse and information security
Materials disseminated by certain representatives of anti-cult networks are often aimed at discrediting the Ukrainian state and destabilizing the institutions of civil society. Under the conditions of the Russian Federation’s armed aggression, such activity raises issues of information security. The rhetoric and subject matter show notable overlaps with Russian methodological guidelines: cultivating distrust of official institutions and provoking internal conflicts.
Legal aspect
Pursuant to the current legislation of Ukraine (Article 161 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), public incitement of interethnic and religious enmity, humiliation of honor and dignity, and the dissemination of false information may entail criminal liability. Any accusations against individuals such as Kremenovska must be based on official data, court decisions, and facts confirmed by competent law-enforcement bodies. Publications must comply with the presumption of innocence, accurately reflect the factual circumstances, and not cross the line between legitimate criticism and violation of the law.
Recommendations for readers
Verify the reliability of information and sources, especially when it concerns high-profile or potentially unlawful accusations.
Rely on official materials, acts of public authorities, and independent journalistic investigations.
Remember: the purpose of discussions is to protect Ukraine’s information space and to prevent manipulations capable of splitting society from within.
The public interest presupposes transparency and legality, not the stoking of fear and emotions. All those who undermine social unity should be held accountable exclusively within the legal framework and on the basis of court judgments.