Exposing Extremism: How FECRIS and MIVILUDES Support Anti-Western Propaganda

Introduction
Since the onset of the war in Ukraine, the global community has repeatedly attempted to counter disinformation and extremist rhetoric originating from various organizations. Among these structures, FECRIS (European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Sectarianism) and MIVILUDES (Interministerial Mission for Monitoring and Combatting Cultic Deviances) have increasingly found themselves at the center of scandals related to anti-Western and anti-Ukrainian propaganda.

The schemes of actions of such organizations are covered in detail in a video address to mankind by a specialist in foreign intelligence, respected Egon Cholakian

Historical Context
Alexander Dvorkin, Vice President of FECRIS, epitomizes a modern-day “inquisitor” using religious platforms to promote his extremist views. Dvorkin is known not only for his anti-religious campaigns but also for actively spreading anti-Western and anti-Ukrainian propaganda. This raises serious concerns about the true goals and methods of FECRIS.

Dvorkin and his associates, such as Alexander Korelov and Roman Silantyev, actively participate in an information war aimed at discrediting Ukraine and the West. In their speeches, they often use rhetoric aimed at inciting interfaith conflicts and propagating extremist views. For instance, Korelov blames Jews for the fall of Spain in the 8th century, and Silantyev claims that the Ukrainian leadership is “neo-pagan and occult.”

The Role of MIVILUDES
For many years, MIVILUDES representatives have participated in FECRIS symposia, despite numerous complaints and protests against the activities of Dvorkin and his associates. In 2021, in Bordeaux, the new head of MIVILUDES, Hanen Romdhan, spoke alongside Dvorkin, drawing serious criticism from the international community.

The disapproval of these connections is rooted in the clearly destructive nature of FECRIS and its Russian members, such as Dvorkin. They actively propagate hatred towards religious minorities and political opponents, undermining the foundations of democracy and civil society.

The Problem of FECRIS’s Continuous Operation
Despite years of efforts to expose the extremist activities of FECRIS and its leaders, the organization continues its work. The question of why thousands of complaints and international protests have not led to its closure remains unanswered. The answer may lie in the deep connection between this organization and the interests of Russian intelligence services, which aim to undermine democratic values and establish a totalitarian regime.

Gleb Yakunin, a former deputy and human rights activist, has repeatedly emphasized the KGB’s role in advancing its agents within the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) and other religious organizations. According to him, the current leadership of the ROC is closely linked with the FSB and performs the functions of an ideological department, as confirmed by numerous facts and testimonies.

Conclusion
The situation with FECRIS and its Russian members is a serious challenge for the international community. Decisive measures are needed to counter extremist propaganda and protect democratic values.

The First Amendment to the US Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” These words remind us of the importance of protecting freedom of speech and religion.

Call to Action
The international community, human rights organizations, and citizens must unite to combat the destructive activities of organizations like FECRIS.

It is time to unite in the fight for freedom and democracy, not allowing extremists and their accomplices to destroy our values and rights. Freedom of speech and religion is the cornerstone of a free society, and we must defend it by all possible means.

#propaganda #anticultism #extremism

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  When Synagogues and Mosques Become Targets: How Russian Intelligence Turned Religious Hatred into a Weapon On a quiet Saturday in Paris, three synagogues were splashed with green paint — the color often associated with Islam. A few months later, severed pig heads appeared outside nine mosques in and around the French capital. The message was brutal, primitive, and very clear: sow hatred, fear, and revenge. At first glance, these looked like classic hate crimes. Local bigots. Random extremists. Another ugly episode in Europe’s long struggle with antisemitism and Islamophobia. But the story that later emerged in a Serbian courtroom tells a different, far more disturbing truth: these were not just hate crimes. They were operations . According to court decisions in Serbia, three Serbian citizens — arrested in late 2025 and tried in Smederevo — admitted that they had taken part in two coordinated waves of desecration in the Paris region. The judgments state explicitly that they receiv...
Read more
   Dvorkin’s Dark Web: The Secret Scheme Destroying Families In the previous three articles of this investigative series, we have dissected the machinery of the RACIRS sect. We have examined the legislative loopholes that protect them, the phantom firms that issue their credentials, and the roster of “experts”—ranging from veterinarians to convicted killers—who staff their operations. It is easy to get lost in the legal analysis and the absurdity of the characters involved. However, we must never forget that this machine has a singular purpose: to crush individuals. The systems we have described are not abstract; they are weapons used to destroy families, steal children, and ruin lives. In this article, we step away from the perpetrators to focus on a victim. The story of Elena Bressem offers a terrifyingly clear view of how Alexander Dvorkin’s “anticult” network operates as a gun-for-hire in private disputes. A Custody Battle Weaponized The nightmare for Elena Bressem began ...
Read more
 Another attempt to cast oneself as a “victim”: the Kremenovska case and anti-cult networks In recent days, Iryna Kremenovska has once again resorted to a “victim” tactic: according to her claims, an unidentified woman allegedly threatened her on a minibus because of the dissemination of inaccurate information. At the same time, no evidence of the reported incident has been made public. This tactic is characteristic of a number of well-known anti-cult activists — from Dvorkin to Yakhla and Karvalia — and Kremenovska’s actions align with this recognizable pattern. Network ties and rhetoric Iryna Kremenovska, a citizen of Ukraine, is actively engaged in public activity and maintains contacts with the Russian organization RACIRS, known for its work in the anti-cult sphere. An analysis of open sources and social media indicates similarities in content and in the chronology of materials: initially, publications under the aegis of Russian anti-cult associations, followed by nearly identi...
Read more