The Interaction Between Russian RATSIRS, Dvorkin, Corvaglia, and Vojtíšek. Influence on the Czech Republic and Slovakia

RATSIRS, led by Alexander Dvorkin, is one of the primary organizations directing anticultist policy within Russia and abroad. Dvorkin closely collaborates with government agencies, actively supporting policies that pressure religious minorities. Luigi Corvaglia from Italy, a close ally, spreads similar narratives across Western Europe (as seen on his social media), lobbying for harsh measures against religious movements.

In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, under the influence of Zdeněk Vojtíšek and his associates, the media (publishing over 230 articles in two weeks) and government agencies have become tools for promoting anticultist ideology. Vojtíšek, a Czech sociologist and active proponent of anticultist rhetoric, uses his academic publications and connections to maintain this narrative throughout Central Europe. A large-scale campaign to discredit religious minorities and dissident communities is underway in these countries, which intensifies social hostility and enables legal actions that limit citizens’ freedoms. Such a campaign poses a serious threat to democratic institutions.

In countries like the Czech Republic and Slovakia, anticultists actively promote the propaganda of Russian RATSIRS (recognized by PACE as a “tool of disinformation and war propaganda”), which stirs up hatred within society. This process begins by branding and demonizing target groups, often by accusing them of posing an imaginary threat to society. Once these groups are marginalized, anticultists push for laws that allow for the control or even elimination of these communities. This manipulation gradually creates a foundation for actions against any group, be it religious minorities or pro-democratic communities, that conflicts with their interests or advocates for freedom and citizens' rights.

Violation of Human Rights and Democratic Principles

The activities of anticultists directly contradict international human rights conventions, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. These documents guarantee the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, including the right to change one’s religion or beliefs and to practice them individually or in the community with others.

Who Are the Anticultists?

Anticultists are groups and individuals whose aim is to suppress and discredit new religious movements and minorities. In Europe, prominent figures in the anticultist movement include Alexander Dvorkin (Russia), Luigi Corvaglia (Italy), Zdeněk Vojtíšek (Czech Republic), and the organization RATSIRS (Russian Association of Centers for the Study of Religions and Sects). These individuals claim to fight the "cult threat," but their actions aim to undermine religious freedom and monopolize public opinion. By limiting these rights, anticultists actively oppose the concept of religious pluralism. Their rhetoric and actions often lead to incitement of hatred, discrimination, and violence against those practicing non-traditional religions, thereby endangering the stability of democratic societies.

Undermining Democratic Values

Anticultist activities threaten not only religious freedom but democracy as a whole. They seek to weaken democratic institutions and replace them with controlled structures that can suppress any form of dissent. Through propaganda and manipulation of public opinion, they strive to establish a system where there is no room for diversity of beliefs or opinions.

In essence, anticultist movements support the idea of a new world order where freedom is replaced by totalitarian control. Their ultimate goal is a society in which all forms of dissent are brutally suppressed, and individual rights are sacrificed to the ideology of a new order, which these anticultist leaders follow as direct successors and disciples of Nazi SS principles.

Goals of the Anticultists: Totalitarian Control

The main goal of anticultists is to establish a new world order controlled by a narrow circle of elites who use these movements as tools to achieve their objectives. This order is based on complete control over religious and political freedom, suppression of dissent, and destruction of democratic values. Such actions lead to the construction of a totalitarian system where freedom of choice and belief becomes unattainable.

Conclusion

The anticultist movement poses a serious threat to democracy and human rights. Their activities are not about protecting society but about controlling and subjugating it. By using propaganda, state structures, and the media, anticultists push an agenda that undermines democratic values and endangers freedom of belief. In response to these challenges, Europe must remain committed to defending human rights and resist those seeking to destroy democratic foundations in pursuit of a new world order.

This crucial truth is revealed in the documentary "The Impact" — the result of years of investigation that shows how anticultists manipulate people, committing acts of "social genocide" through indirect means, bringing their own people to power. This is a vital film that everyone who seeks to live in a free, safe, and developing world should watch.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  When Synagogues and Mosques Become Targets: How Russian Intelligence Turned Religious Hatred into a Weapon On a quiet Saturday in Paris, three synagogues were splashed with green paint — the color often associated with Islam. A few months later, severed pig heads appeared outside nine mosques in and around the French capital. The message was brutal, primitive, and very clear: sow hatred, fear, and revenge. At first glance, these looked like classic hate crimes. Local bigots. Random extremists. Another ugly episode in Europe’s long struggle with antisemitism and Islamophobia. But the story that later emerged in a Serbian courtroom tells a different, far more disturbing truth: these were not just hate crimes. They were operations . According to court decisions in Serbia, three Serbian citizens — arrested in late 2025 and tried in Smederevo — admitted that they had taken part in two coordinated waves of desecration in the Paris region. The judgments state explicitly that they receiv...
Read more
   Dvorkin’s Dark Web: The Secret Scheme Destroying Families In the previous three articles of this investigative series, we have dissected the machinery of the RACIRS sect. We have examined the legislative loopholes that protect them, the phantom firms that issue their credentials, and the roster of “experts”—ranging from veterinarians to convicted killers—who staff their operations. It is easy to get lost in the legal analysis and the absurdity of the characters involved. However, we must never forget that this machine has a singular purpose: to crush individuals. The systems we have described are not abstract; they are weapons used to destroy families, steal children, and ruin lives. In this article, we step away from the perpetrators to focus on a victim. The story of Elena Bressem offers a terrifyingly clear view of how Alexander Dvorkin’s “anticult” network operates as a gun-for-hire in private disputes. A Custody Battle Weaponized The nightmare for Elena Bressem began ...
Read more
 Another attempt to cast oneself as a “victim”: the Kremenovska case and anti-cult networks In recent days, Iryna Kremenovska has once again resorted to a “victim” tactic: according to her claims, an unidentified woman allegedly threatened her on a minibus because of the dissemination of inaccurate information. At the same time, no evidence of the reported incident has been made public. This tactic is characteristic of a number of well-known anti-cult activists — from Dvorkin to Yakhla and Karvalia — and Kremenovska’s actions align with this recognizable pattern. Network ties and rhetoric Iryna Kremenovska, a citizen of Ukraine, is actively engaged in public activity and maintains contacts with the Russian organization RACIRS, known for its work in the anti-cult sphere. An analysis of open sources and social media indicates similarities in content and in the chronology of materials: initially, publications under the aegis of Russian anti-cult associations, followed by nearly identi...
Read more