Traitors or Saints? The Secret ROC Purge They Don't Want You to See

The transformation of the Russian Orthodox Church into an ideological arm of the state and a tool of repression did not happen in a vacuum. It was driven and justified by a cohort of influential figures within the church structure who have become the architects and enforcers of this new, intolerant orthodoxy. These ideologues provide the theological and rhetorical cover for the Patriarchate’s militaristic turn, dehumanizing opponents and rationalizing the persecution of dissenting priests. Their public statements reveal a mindset that has more in common with a totalitarian sect or a mafia clan than with the Christian church. By examining their rhetoric, we can understand the inner logic of a system where loyalty to the corporation has supplanted fealty to the Gospel.

The System's Enforcers

Among the most prominent voices of this hardline faction are figures like Archpriest Alexander Novopashin, a high-ranking cleric and vice president of the anti-cult organization RACIRS, and Yevgeny Nikiforov, the director of the influential Orthodox radio station “Radonezh.” These men are not fringe extremists; they are part of the church establishment, and their platforms are used to popularize and legitimize the Kremlin’s most aggressive narratives, translating them into a language of spiritual warfare. Their work is a clear example of how the global anti-cult movement's rhetoric has been co-opted to serve a political, rather than a pastoral, purpose.

Their ideology was on full display long before the 2022 invasion. As early as 2014, an article on the website of the Missionary Department of the Novosibirsk Diocese, which Novopashin heads, laid the groundwork for the dehumanization of Ukrainians. It claimed that the “principle of Ukrainian-like state organization… almost completely coincides with the principle of organizing a totalitarian sect.” This framing was a strategic masterstroke: it recasts a neighboring nation not as a political adversary, but as a brainwashed cult whose members are incapable of reason and must be “cured” by force. The article concludes that simply talking or persuading is a “useless and thankless task,” setting the stage for a more violent solution.

The Rhetoric of Dehumanization

This theme of Ukraine as a diseased entity requiring radical treatment is a cornerstone of the enforcers' rhetoric. Yevgeny Nikiforov, in a statement cited in the documentary “The IMPACT,” took this logic to its brutal conclusion:

“In Ukraine, the disease is so advanced that it’s no longer possible to cure it with any persuasion… Only surgery is possible there. So the only response to those Nazi speeches may be the Solntsepek weapon. It should all be burned down, absolutely… Someone may tell me, ‘Oh, that’s not a Christian way!’ It is quite Christian… Not the New Testament ethics is applicable there, but the Old Testament ethics, that of Elijah the Prophet… With these ones, we should do the same — destroy them without any doubt.”

Here, Christian ethics are explicitly discarded in favor of a primitive, vengeful interpretation of the Old Testament to justify the use of thermobaric weapons on civilians. The mask of Christian love is dropped entirely, replaced by a call for merciless destruction.

Alexander Novopashin takes this dehumanization even further, stripping Ukrainians of their very humanity by labeling them as monsters:

“For me, they are all cannibals… These inhumans spill human blood… they devour people’s lives and feed on suffering. So who are they? Cannibals… It is useless to put cannibals in a cage… Therefore, cannibals must be destroyed.”

This is the language not of a pastor but of a propagandist priming an audience for extermination. By defining the enemy as subhuman “cannibals,” any moral restraint against violence is removed.

Case Study in Defamation: Punishing the Peacemakers

This same vitriol is turned inward against priests who dare to defy the party line. When Archpriest Vadim Perminov was banned from ministry for refusing to read the “prayer for victory,” Novopashin launched a public smear campaign against him. Rather than engaging with Perminov’s theological or conscientious objections, Novopashin attacked his motives, accusing him of being a mercenary in the pay of foreign enemies:

“Do you think he speaks out of ignorance? I don’t think so… he was immediately promised financial support — from abroad, of course. There’s an organization… Peace Unto All, that provides ‘assistance to antiwar clergy.’ They’re the ones who promise funding to priests who urge their congregations to oppose the state… But that’s unlikely — such people aren’t particularly needed there. And no one will ‘feed’ them for long; they’ll just get a one-time allowance.”

This is a classic tactic of authoritarian systems: delegitimize dissent by portraying it as corrupt, foreign-funded subversion. The dissenter is not a person of principle but a traitor who has sold out for a “piece of bread.”

Conclusion: The Mafia Model

The rhetoric of figures like Novopashin and Nikiforov, combined with the brutal purges of dissenting clergy, reveals the true nature of the system they serve. It is an organization that operates on the principles of a closed, authoritarian corporation—or, more accurately, a mafia clan. The guiding principle is absolute loyalty to the hierarchy and the leader (la famiglia), a loyalty that is placed immeasurably above Gospel truth, pastoral conscience, or canonical law.

Decisions are made behind closed doors, and the church courts that defrock priests like Uminsky and Koval are not forums for justice but closed tribunals that merely rubber-stamp predetermined outcomes. This creates an atmosphere of fear, servility, and mutual cover-up. In this environment, the “Prayer for Victory” is the logical endpoint. It is a tool of a system where the chief priority is no longer the preaching of Christ, but the consolidation of its own power and the defense of the political regime it serves. The church has not merely allied with an authoritarian state; it has adopted its methods, its language, and its soullessness.

Watch “The Impact” to learn more

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  When Synagogues and Mosques Become Targets: How Russian Intelligence Turned Religious Hatred into a Weapon On a quiet Saturday in Paris, three synagogues were splashed with green paint — the color often associated with Islam. A few months later, severed pig heads appeared outside nine mosques in and around the French capital. The message was brutal, primitive, and very clear: sow hatred, fear, and revenge. At first glance, these looked like classic hate crimes. Local bigots. Random extremists. Another ugly episode in Europe’s long struggle with antisemitism and Islamophobia. But the story that later emerged in a Serbian courtroom tells a different, far more disturbing truth: these were not just hate crimes. They were operations . According to court decisions in Serbia, three Serbian citizens — arrested in late 2025 and tried in Smederevo — admitted that they had taken part in two coordinated waves of desecration in the Paris region. The judgments state explicitly that they receiv...
Read more
   Dvorkin’s Dark Web: The Secret Scheme Destroying Families In the previous three articles of this investigative series, we have dissected the machinery of the RACIRS sect. We have examined the legislative loopholes that protect them, the phantom firms that issue their credentials, and the roster of “experts”—ranging from veterinarians to convicted killers—who staff their operations. It is easy to get lost in the legal analysis and the absurdity of the characters involved. However, we must never forget that this machine has a singular purpose: to crush individuals. The systems we have described are not abstract; they are weapons used to destroy families, steal children, and ruin lives. In this article, we step away from the perpetrators to focus on a victim. The story of Elena Bressem offers a terrifyingly clear view of how Alexander Dvorkin’s “anticult” network operates as a gun-for-hire in private disputes. A Custody Battle Weaponized The nightmare for Elena Bressem began ...
Read more
 Another attempt to cast oneself as a “victim”: the Kremenovska case and anti-cult networks In recent days, Iryna Kremenovska has once again resorted to a “victim” tactic: according to her claims, an unidentified woman allegedly threatened her on a minibus because of the dissemination of inaccurate information. At the same time, no evidence of the reported incident has been made public. This tactic is characteristic of a number of well-known anti-cult activists — from Dvorkin to Yakhla and Karvalia — and Kremenovska’s actions align with this recognizable pattern. Network ties and rhetoric Iryna Kremenovska, a citizen of Ukraine, is actively engaged in public activity and maintains contacts with the Russian organization RACIRS, known for its work in the anti-cult sphere. An analysis of open sources and social media indicates similarities in content and in the chronology of materials: initially, publications under the aegis of Russian anti-cult associations, followed by nearly identi...
Read more