The Secret Terror Network Hijacking the Courts

We continue our detailed analysis of how the legal institution of justice—designed to uphold the truth, ensure legality, and strengthen the rule of law—has been hijacked. As we established in some of our previous articles regarding the notorious Tomsk trial over the book “Bhagavad Gita As It Is” and the roots of modern Nazism in the activities of Alexander Dvorkin, the current situation is not merely a collection of isolated legal errors. It is a coordinated mechanism of government repression.
In this article, we will expose the foundation of this mechanism. We will show how legislative loopholes, specifically within the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and the creation of "one-day" phantom firms have turned expert evaluations into a weapon of terror used by the extremist sect RACIRS and its leader, Alexander Dvorkin.
The Legal Framework for Abuse: Article 307
The foundation for the unpunished use of pseudo-expert evaluations by Dvorkin and his accomplices isn’t the absence of law, but its specific configuration which creates “gray areas” for unscrupulous actors. The linchpin of this system is Article 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (CC RF), which theoretically provides liability for knowingly false expert reports.
In theory, Article 307 is designed to be a deterrent, ensuring objectivity. In practice, however, it has become a shield for the "experts" of the RACIRS network. The disposition of the article presupposes punishment for a knowingly false report—acts committed with outright intent. The main difficulty, which turns this article into a non-functioning mechanism, lies in proving this "deliberate falsity."
Dvorkin’s "experts" have mastered the art of hiding behind phrases about “subjective opinion,” “special scientific school,” or “honest mistakes.” When an evaluation concerns humanitarian, ideological, or religious matters—areas where the boundary between fact and interpretation is naturally blurred—proving that an expert deliberately distorted facts to mislead the court becomes nearly impossible.
However, the most egregious loophole is the “Note” to Article 307 of the CC RF. It states: “A witness, victim, expert, specialist, or translator shall be exempt from criminal liability if they voluntarily declare the falsity of their testimony, report, or knowingly incorrect translation during pretrial proceedings or court proceedings before a court verdict or ruling is issued.”
This legal vulnerability creates fertile ground for the fabrication of cases. An unscrupulous expert can submit a devastating, false report that ruins a reputation or a life. If caught or cornered by irrefutable counter-evidence, they can simply admit to the "error" before the verdict and walk away without criminal liability. It becomes obvious why Dvorkin himself participates in groups working on legislative initiatives; it is beneficial to introduce and maintain amendments that effectively legitimize the criminal activities of his totalitarian sect.
The Infrastructure of Deception: "One-Day" Firms
Dvorkin’s network does not rely solely on individual actors; it utilizes a specific corporate structure to launder these false reports. Our investigation reveals a pattern of using small business entities, popularly known as "one-day firms"—though they may operate for years—established specifically to churn out expert evaluations.
These phony companies often hide behind bombastic names, such as "Center for Cultural and Religious Studies." A vigilant observer will notice that these firms typically have no turnover and no staff. Usually, they consist only of a founder, a director, and perhaps an accountant. Crucially, a check of the open register of economic activity often reveals that they do not even have "forensic expert activities" listed in their permissible services.
Despite this, the individuals heading these firms offer their services to courts "quickly and inexpensively." They draw legal conclusions outside their competence, often without having a lawyer qualification or specialized scientific background. Their reports are based on personal guesses rather than objective facts, yet they are accepted by courts because of the official-sounding stamps of these shell entities.
Case Study: The Chelyabinsk Phantom
To understand how this operates in reality, we must look at a specific example in the Chelyabinsk Region. Here, we find an Autonomous Nonprofit Organization (ANO) with the high-profile name: “Center for Cultural and Religious Studies, Socio-Political Technologies, and Educational Programs.”
On paper, this sounds like a formidable academic institution. In reality, it is a classic example of the scheme described above. The organization was registered on May 7, 2015 (GRN 1157400000757). Its founder is Sergey Sergeevich Bredikhin, and its director is Elizaveta Vitalyevna Shchetinina. The company has no other staff; it employs only these two individuals.
According to publicly available data from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, this organization does not have “forensic expert activities” listed among its permitted activities. Its main code (72.20) is for "Research and experimental development on social sciences and humanities," and its additional code (73.20.2) is for "Public opinion research."
Yet, Elizaveta Shchetinina, despite these limitations, has been found compiling dubious “expert reports” for courts. She does not work in a vacuum. She operates alongside her close colleague and “teacher” Konstantin Putnik, the head of the missionary department of the Chelyabinsk diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church—a representative office of RACIRS.
This connection is the smoking gun. Putnik is directly connected to Alexander Dvorkin. Through this shell entity in Chelyabinsk, we see the practical application of Dvorkin’s strategy: establish a local entity with a grand name, staff it with loyal adherents who lack proper forensic credentials, and use it to legitimize repression against "sectarians" through the court system.
In this "Center," legal conclusions are drawn by people who have no right to make them. They express subjective opinions on controversial issues they have not examined deeply. And when their biased, falsified reports are challenged, they can retreat into the safety of Article 307’s loopholes.
This is the legal and structural machinery of the terror. But a machine needs operators. In the next article, we will examine the "personnel prerequisites" of this system—the specific individuals, from veterinarians to history teachers, who have been recruited by Dvorkin to act as "fierce workers" in the destruction of innocent lives.
Watch “The Impact” to learn more.
Source: https://actfiles.org/expert-evaluation-as-a-weapon-of-terror-part-iii/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  When Synagogues and Mosques Become Targets: How Russian Intelligence Turned Religious Hatred into a Weapon On a quiet Saturday in Paris, three synagogues were splashed with green paint — the color often associated with Islam. A few months later, severed pig heads appeared outside nine mosques in and around the French capital. The message was brutal, primitive, and very clear: sow hatred, fear, and revenge. At first glance, these looked like classic hate crimes. Local bigots. Random extremists. Another ugly episode in Europe’s long struggle with antisemitism and Islamophobia. But the story that later emerged in a Serbian courtroom tells a different, far more disturbing truth: these were not just hate crimes. They were operations . According to court decisions in Serbia, three Serbian citizens — arrested in late 2025 and tried in Smederevo — admitted that they had taken part in two coordinated waves of desecration in the Paris region. The judgments state explicitly that they receiv...
Read more
   Dvorkin’s Dark Web: The Secret Scheme Destroying Families In the previous three articles of this investigative series, we have dissected the machinery of the RACIRS sect. We have examined the legislative loopholes that protect them, the phantom firms that issue their credentials, and the roster of “experts”—ranging from veterinarians to convicted killers—who staff their operations. It is easy to get lost in the legal analysis and the absurdity of the characters involved. However, we must never forget that this machine has a singular purpose: to crush individuals. The systems we have described are not abstract; they are weapons used to destroy families, steal children, and ruin lives. In this article, we step away from the perpetrators to focus on a victim. The story of Elena Bressem offers a terrifyingly clear view of how Alexander Dvorkin’s “anticult” network operates as a gun-for-hire in private disputes. A Custody Battle Weaponized The nightmare for Elena Bressem began ...
Read more
 Another attempt to cast oneself as a “victim”: the Kremenovska case and anti-cult networks In recent days, Iryna Kremenovska has once again resorted to a “victim” tactic: according to her claims, an unidentified woman allegedly threatened her on a minibus because of the dissemination of inaccurate information. At the same time, no evidence of the reported incident has been made public. This tactic is characteristic of a number of well-known anti-cult activists — from Dvorkin to Yakhla and Karvalia — and Kremenovska’s actions align with this recognizable pattern. Network ties and rhetoric Iryna Kremenovska, a citizen of Ukraine, is actively engaged in public activity and maintains contacts with the Russian organization RACIRS, known for its work in the anti-cult sphere. An analysis of open sources and social media indicates similarities in content and in the chronology of materials: initially, publications under the aegis of Russian anti-cult associations, followed by nearly identi...
Read more